{"id":4216,"date":"2026-04-24T01:02:59","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T01:02:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nylonplastic.com\/?p=4216"},"modified":"2026-06-11T03:21:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T03:21:12","slug":"nylon-vs-pom-polyoxymethylene-comparison-technical","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nylonplastic.com\/ko\/nylon-vs-pom-polyoxymethylene-comparison-technical\/","title":{"rendered":"\ub098\uc77c\ub860\uacfc POM(\uc544\uc138\ud0c8) \ube44\uad50: \uc5d4\uc9c0\ub2c8\uc5b4\ub9c1 \ud50c\ub77c\uc2a4\ud2f1 \ube44\uad50 \uac00\uc774\ub4dc"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Nylon
Nylon vs POM comparison \u2014 Nylon Plastic<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\uc5d4\uc9c0\ub2c8\uc5b4\ub9c1 \uc560\ud50c\ub9ac\ucf00\uc774\uc158\uc744 \uc704\ud55c \ub098\uc77c\ub860\uacfc POM(\uc544\uc138\ud0c8\/\ub378\ub9b0)\uc758 \uc77c\ub300\uc77c \ube44\uad50 - \uae30\uacc4\uc801, \uc5f4\uc801, \ud654\ud559\uc801, \ub9c8\ubaa8 \ubc0f \uac00\uacf5\uc0c1\uc758 \ucc28\uc774\uc810.<\/p>\n

Table of Contents<\/strong><\/p>\n
    \n
  1. \ub098\uc77c\ub860\uacfc POM: \uc5d4\uc9c0\ub2c8\uc5b4\ub9c1 \ud50c\ub77c\uc2a4\ud2f1\uc758 \ub450 \uac70\uc778<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. \uae30\uacc4\uc801 \ud2b9\uc131 \ube44\uad50<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. \uc5f4 \ubc0f \ud658\uacbd \uc131\ub2a5<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. \ub0b4\ud654\ud559\uc131: \uac01 \uc18c\uc7ac\uc758 \uc6b0\uc218\uc131<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. \ub9c8\ubaa8 \ubc0f \ub9c8\ucc30 \uc131\ub2a5<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. \uc120\ud0dd \ubc29\ubc95: \uc758\uc0ac \uacb0\uc815 \ud504\ub808\uc784\uc6cc\ud06c<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

    \ub098\uc77c\ub860\uacfc POM: \uc5d4\uc9c0\ub2c8\uc5b4\ub9c1 \ud50c\ub77c\uc2a4\ud2f1\uc758 \ub450 \uac70\uc778<\/h2>\n

    \ub098\uc77c\ub860(\ud3f4\ub9ac\uc544\ubbf8\ub4dc)\uacfc POM(\ud3f4\ub9ac\uc625\uc2dc\uba54\ud2f8\ub80c, \uc544\uc138\ud0c8 \ub610\ub294 \ub378\ub9b0\uc774\ub77c\uace0\ub3c4 \ud568)\uc740 \uae30\uacc4 \ubd80\ud488\uc5d0 \uac00\uc7a5 \ub9ce\uc774 \uc0ac\uc6a9\ub418\ub294 \ub450 \uac00\uc9c0 \uc5d4\uc9c0\ub2c8\uc5b4\ub9c1 \uc5f4\uac00\uc18c\uc131 \ud50c\ub77c\uc2a4\ud2f1\uc785\ub2c8\ub2e4. \ub450 \uc18c\uc7ac \ubaa8\ub450 \ub6f0\uc5b4\ub09c \ub0b4\ub9c8\ubaa8\uc131, \ub0ae\uc740 \ub9c8\ucc30, \uc6b0\uc218\ud55c \uce58\uc218 \uc548\uc815\uc131\uc744 \uc81c\uacf5\ud558\uc9c0\ub9cc \ubd84\uc790 \uad6c\uc870\uac00 \ub2e4\ub974\uae30 \ub54c\ubb38\uc5d0 \uc815\ubc00 \uc560\ud50c\ub9ac\ucf00\uc774\uc158\uc5d0\uc11c \ub9e4\uc6b0 \uc911\uc694\ud55c \uc131\ub2a5 \uc808\ucda9\uc810\uc744 \ub9cc\ub4e4\uc5b4\ub0c5\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n

    \ub098\uc77c\ub860\uacfc POM \uc911 \ud558\ub098\ub97c \uc120\ud0dd\ud558\ub294 \uac83\uc740 \uac04\ub2e8\ud558\uc9c0 \uc54a\uc2b5\ub2c8\ub2e4. POM\uc73c\ub85c 50,000 \uc0ac\uc774\ud074\uc744 \uacac\ub514\ub294 \ubca0\uc5b4\ub9c1\uc740 \ub3d9\uc77c\ud55c \ud558\uc911\uc5d0\uc11c \ub098\uc77c\ub860\uc73c\ub85c 8,000 \uc0ac\uc774\ud074\uc744 \uacac\ub514\uba74 \uace0\uc7a5\ub0a0 \uc218 \uc788\uc2b5\ub2c8\ub2e4. \ubc18\ub300\ub85c \uc790\ub3d9\ucc28 \uc720\uccb4\uc5d0 \ub178\ucd9c\ub41c \uae30\uc5b4 \ud558\uc6b0\uc9d5\uc740 POM\uc5d0\uc11c\ub294 \uade0\uc5f4\uc774 \ubc1c\uc0dd\ud558\uc9c0\ub9cc PA66\uc5d0\uc11c\ub294 \uacac\ub51c \uc218 \uc788\uc2b5\ub2c8\ub2e4. \uc774 \uac00\uc774\ub4dc\ub294 \uc5d4\uc9c0\ub2c8\uc5b4\uac00 \uc62c\ubc14\ub978 \uc120\ud0dd\uc744 \ud558\ub294 \ub370 \ud544\uc694\ud55c \ub370\uc774\ud130 \uae30\ubc18 \ube44\uad50 \uc815\ubcf4\ub97c \uc81c\uacf5\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n

    \uae30\uacc4\uc801 \ud2b9\uc131 \ube44\uad50<\/h2>\n

    Tensile and Flexural Properties<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    \uc18d\uc131<\/th>\nPA6<\/th>\nPA66<\/th>\nPOM (Homopolymer)<\/th>\nPOM (Copolymer)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    \uc778\uc7a5 \uac15\ub3c4(MPa)<\/td>\n80<\/td>\n82<\/td>\n70<\/td>\n62<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uc778\uc7a5 \uacc4\uc218(GPa)<\/td>\n2.8<\/td>\n3.0<\/td>\n2.8<\/td>\n2.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uad74\uace1 \uac15\ub3c4(MPa)<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n110<\/td>\n98<\/td>\n90<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uad74\uace1 \ud0c4\uc131\ub960(GPa)<\/td>\n2.6<\/td>\n2.8<\/td>\n2.6<\/td>\n2.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \ud734\uc2dd \uc2dc \uc5f0\uc2e0\uc728 (%)<\/td>\n150<\/td>\n60<\/td>\n40<\/td>\n35<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Notched Izod (J\/m)<\/td>\n55<\/td>\n45<\/td>\n75<\/td>\n65<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \ud06c\ub9ac\ud504 \uacc4\uc218(1000\uc2dc\uac04, 20MPa)<\/td>\n1.2 GPa<\/td>\n1.4 GPa<\/td>\n2.3 GPa<\/td>\n2.0 GPa<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    Key Insight: Creep Resistance<\/strong> \u2014 POM has significantly better creep resistance than nylon. Under sustained loading, POM retains more of its stiffness over time. For components under constant load (spring clips, retaining rings, fastener bushings), POM’s superior creep resistance often makes it the better choice despite similar initial strength.<\/p>\n

    \ub0b4\ucda9\uaca9\uc131<\/strong> \u2014 Nylon has higher unnotched impact resistance. But POM often outperforms nylon in notched impact tests because POM’s ductile failure mode absorbs more energy at the crack tip. For parts with stress concentrations (keyways, holes, threads), POM’s toughness at sharp notches is an advantage.<\/p>\n

    Fatigue Resistance<\/strong> \u2014 Nylon has superior fatigue resistance for repeated loading. In cyclic loading tests, nylon components survive 3-5\u00d7 more cycles before failure than equivalent POM parts. Critical for components like conveyor belt guides, pump impellers, and hinge mechanisms.<\/p>\n

    \uc5f4 \ubc0f \ud658\uacbd \uc131\ub2a5<\/h2>\n

    Thermal Properties<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    \uc18d\uc131<\/th>\nPA6<\/th>\nPA66<\/th>\nPOM<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    \ub179\ub294\uc810(\u00b0C)<\/td>\n225<\/td>\n265<\/td>\n175<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uc5f0\uc18d \uc11c\ube44\uc2a4 \uc628\ub3c4(\u00b0C)<\/td>\n100-115<\/td>\n130-150<\/td>\n90-100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    HDT @ 1.82MPa(\u00b0C)<\/td>\n65<\/td>\n90<\/td>\n95<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    HDT @ 0.45 MPa (\u00b0C)<\/td>\n170<\/td>\n250<\/td>\n160<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uc5f4\ud33d\ucc3d(\u00d710-\u2075\/\u00b0C)<\/td>\n8-9<\/td>\n8-9<\/td>\n11-12<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    POM’s thermal weakness<\/strong> \u2014 The 175\u00b0C melting point of POM is its thermal limitation. At temperatures above 100\u00b0C, POM loses mechanical strength rapidly. PA66-GF30 (HDT 250\u00b0C) operates at temperatures where POM would melt.<\/p>\n

    Moisture Absorption Comparison<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    \uc18d\uc131<\/th>\nPA6<\/th>\nPA66<\/th>\nPOM<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Saturation Moisture (%)<\/td>\n9.5%<\/td>\n8.5%<\/td>\n0.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \ucc28\uc6d0 \ubcc0\ud654(\ucc44\ub3c4)<\/td>\n1.5-2.0%<\/td>\n1.3-1.8%<\/td>\n0.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    POM wins decisively on moisture<\/strong> \u2014 At 0.8% maximum moisture absorption, POM is essentially dimensionally stable in humid environments. Nylon’s 8-9% absorption causes measurable swelling and property changes. For underwater or outdoor exposed applications without encapsulation, POM is often the only viable choice.<\/p>\n

    Related Guides<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Nylon Moisture Effects<\/a>   Outdoor Plastic Selection<\/a>   Nylon Moisture Drying Guide<\/a>   CNC Machining Nylon Tips<\/a>   PC 3D Printing Guide<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \ub0b4\ud654\ud559\uc131: \uac01 \uc18c\uc7ac\uc758 \uc6b0\uc218\uc131<\/h2>\n

    Chemical Resistance Comparison<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Chemical<\/th>\nNylon (PA66)<\/th>\nPOM<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    \ud718\ubc1c\uc720\/\uc5f0\ub8cc<\/td>\n\uc6b0\uc218<\/td>\n\uc6b0\uc218<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \ubaa8\ud130 \uc624\uc77c<\/td>\n\uc6b0\uc218<\/td>\n\uc6b0\uc218<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \ube0c\ub808\uc774\ud06c \uc624\uc77c<\/td>\nGood<\/td>\n\ubd88\ub7c9(\ubd80\ud480\uc5b4 \uc624\ub984)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uc54c\ucf54\uc62c<\/td>\n\uc6b0\uc218<\/td>\nGood<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \ucf00\ud1a4(\uc544\uc138\ud1a4)<\/td>\nGood<\/td>\n\ubd88\ub7c9(\uc6a9\ud574\ub428)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uc57d\uc0b0<\/td>\n\uacf5\uc815<\/td>\nGood<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uac15\uc0b0<\/td>\nPoor<\/td>\nPoor<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uc5d0\uc2a4\ud14c\ub974\/\uac00\uc18c\uc81c<\/td>\n\uc6b0\uc218<\/td>\nPoor<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Hot Water (>60\u00b0C)<\/td>\nPoor<\/td>\nGood<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Steam<\/td>\nPoor<\/td>\nPoor<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    Critical Decision Points<\/strong>: – Brake fluid or glycol coolants<\/strong>: POM swells and cracks \u2014 use PA66 or PA12 – Hot water (>60\u00b0C)<\/strong>: Nylon hydrolyzes \u2014 use POM or PVDF – Plasticizer migration<\/strong> (flexible cables, wire insulation): POM absorbs plasticizers \u2014 use PA12 – Automotive under-hood<\/strong>: PA66-GF30 for its heat resistance (180\u00b0C+) and fluid resistance – Consumer appliances<\/strong>: POM for its dimensional stability and surface finish<\/p>\n

    \ub9c8\ubaa8 \ubc0f \ub9c8\ucc30 \uc131\ub2a5<\/h2>\n

    \ub450 \uc18c\uc7ac \ubaa8\ub450 \ub9c8\ucc30\uc774 \uc801\uace0 \ub0b4\ub9c8\ubaa8\uc131\uc774 \uc6b0\uc218\ud558\uc9c0\ub9cc \uc911\uc694\ud55c \ucc28\uc774\uc810\uc774 \uc788\uc2b5\ub2c8\ub2e4:<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    \uc18d\uc131<\/th>\nPA6<\/th>\nPA66<\/th>\nPOM<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    \ub9c8\ucc30 \uacc4\uc218(\uac15\ucca0 \ub300\ube44, \uac74\uc2dd)<\/td>\n0.25-0.40<\/td>\n0.20-0.35<\/td>\n0.15-0.35<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    PV \uc81c\ud55c(MPa-m\/min)<\/td>\n80-120<\/td>\n90-130<\/td>\n80-100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Wear Factor (vs. steel, dry)<\/td>\n15-40<\/td>\n10-30<\/td>\n1-3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \uae30\uacc4 \uac00\uacf5\uc131<\/td>\nGood<\/td>\n\uc6b0\uc218<\/td>\n\uc6b0\uc218<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    The critical difference: wear factor<\/strong> \u2014 POM’s wear factor (1-3) is 10-20\u00d7 lower than nylon’s (10-40). This means POM parts generate less heat and wear more slowly in sliding contact. For high-PV applications (bearings, wear strips, sliding inserts), POM is the superior choice.<\/p>\n

    Self-lubricating versions<\/strong>: – POM + PTFE<\/strong>: Wear factor drops to 0.5-1.0 \u2014 excellent for boundary lubrication – PA6\/66 + PTFE or silicone<\/strong>: Significantly reduces friction, but PTFE can migrate to surface and affect bonding – Carbon fiber reinforced<\/strong>: Improves wear resistance in both materials, especially at elevated temperatures<\/p>\n

    Surface Speed Consideration<\/strong>: At surface speeds above 1 m\/s in dry sliding, both materials generate enough heat to cause thermal softening. For high-speed applications, consider internally lubricated grades or oil-impregnated sintered bronze backings.<\/p>\n

    \"Injection
    Nylon injection molding guide \u2014 Nylon Plastic<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    \uc120\ud0dd \ubc29\ubc95: \uc758\uc0ac \uacb0\uc815 \ud504\ub808\uc784\uc6cc\ud06c<\/h2>\n

    Choose Nylon (PA66-GF30) when:<\/strong> – Operating temperature exceeds 100\u00b0C – Repeated impact or cyclic loading is expected – Exposure to brake fluid, coolants, or plasticizers – You need higher fatigue life in dynamic loading – Cost is the primary driver (PA66 is generally less expensive than POM)<\/p>\n

    Choose POM when:<\/strong> – Dimensional stability in humid environments is critical – Low friction and low wear factor are priorities (sliding\/rotating contact) – Parts will be exposed to hot water or steam – Acetone, esters, or plasticizers are present – You need excellent surface finish and tight tolerances<\/p>\n

    Hybrid Solution \u2014 Metal Replacement<\/strong>: For many metal-replacement applications, the choice is not between nylon and POM, but between them and aluminum. Nylon-GF and POM are both excellent metal substitutes for housings, brackets, and structural components, offering 70-85% weight reduction vs. aluminum with adequate strength. For these applications, PA66-GF30 is the default choice due to its superior thermal and fluid resistance.<\/p>\n

    Related Products<\/strong><\/p>\n
    \n
    Nylon Rods & Sheets<\/a><\/p>\n

    Semi-finished shapes for CNC machining<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    Nylon Granules (PA6\/PA66\/PA12)<\/a><\/p>\n

    Engineering-grade nylon raw materials for injection molding<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    \uc790\uc8fc \ubb3b\ub294 \uc9c8\ubb38<\/h2>\n
    \"\ub098\uc77c\ub860\uacfc
    \ub098\uc77c\ub860\uacfc POM(\uc544\uc138\ud0c8) \ube44\uad50: \uc5d4\uc9c0\ub2c8\uc5b4\ub9c1 \ud50c\ub77c\uc2a4\ud2f1 \ube44\uad50 \uac00\uc774\ub4dc<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
    \nWhen is Nylon vs. POM (Acetal): Engineering Plastics Comparison Guide a good option?<\/summary>\n
    \n

    Nylon vs. POM (Acetal): Engineering Plastics Comparison Guide is a good option when fast iteration, complex geometry, low tooling cost, or low-volume production is more important than molded-part unit cost.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n

    \nWhat should be checked before choosing Nylon vs. POM (Acetal): Engineering Plastics Comparison Guide?<\/summary>\n
    \n

    \ubd80\ud488 \ud06c\uae30, \uc7ac\ub8cc \ud2b9\uc131, \ud45c\uba74 \ub9c8\uac10, \uce58\uc218 \uacf5\ucc28, \uc5f4 \ub178\ucd9c, \ud558\uc911 \ubc29\ud5a5, \ud6c4\ucc98\ub9ac\uac00 \ud544\uc694\ud55c\uc9c0 \uc5ec\ubd80\ub97c \ud655\uc778\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n

    \nHow does Nylon vs. POM (Acetal): Engineering Plastics Comparison Guide compare with CNC machining?<\/summary>\n
    \n

    3D \ud504\ub9b0\ud305\uc740 \ubcf5\uc7a1\ud55c \ud615\uc0c1\uc744 \ube60\ub974\uac8c \uc81c\uc791\ud560 \uc218 \uc788\ub294 \ubc18\uba74, CNC \uac00\uacf5\uc740 \uc815\ubc00\ud55c \ud45c\uba74, \uc5c4\uaca9\ud55c \uacf5\ucc28 \ubc0f \uc0dd\uc0b0 \ub4f1\uae09 \uc7ac\ub8cc\uc5d0 \ub354 \uc801\ud569\ud55c \uacbd\uc6b0\uac00 \ub9ce\uc2b5\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n

    \nWhat affects the cost of Nylon vs. POM (Acetal): Engineering Plastics Comparison Guide?<\/summary>\n
    \n

    \ube44\uc6a9\uc740 \uc7ac\ub8cc, \ube4c\ub4dc \ubcfc\ub968, \ud504\ub9b0\ud2b8 \uc2dc\uac04, \ub808\uc774\uc5b4 \ub192\uc774, \uc11c\ud3ec\ud2b8 \uc81c\uac70, \ub9c8\uac10, \uac80\uc0ac \ubc0f \ube4c\ub4dc \ub0b4 \ubd80\ud488 \uc218\uc5d0 \ub530\ub77c \ub2ec\ub77c\uc9d1\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n\t\t\t

    \n\t\t\t