Engineering Plastics Selection Guide: Nylon, POM, PC, and PEEK Applications Compared

Engineering plastics selection guide
Selecting the right engineering plastic requires understanding all the options

Choosing between nylon, POM, polycarbonate, and PEEK can be challenging. Each of these engineering plastics offers a unique combination of properties, costs, and processing characteristics.

The Four Major Engineering Plastics at a Glance

Eigentum Nylon (PA6) POM (Acetal) PC PEEK
Strength (MPa) 70-85 60-70 55-75 90-100
Max Use Temp (°C) 100 100 120 250
Chemische Beständigkeit Gut Ausgezeichnet Poor Outstanding
Feuchtigkeitsabsorption Hoch Very Low Very Low Very Low
Relative Kosten $$ $$$ $$$ $$$$$$$$$

Nylon: The All-Round Workhorse

Nylon applications
Nylon offers the best balance of properties and cost

Best For: General engineering applications, parts requiring toughness and fatigue resistance, oil/hydrocarbon exposure, cost-sensitive projects.

Watch Out For: Moisture absorption causing dimensional changes, property variation with humidity, acid exposure.

POM (Acetal): The Precision Specialist

Best For: Precision mechanical components (gears, bearings), dimensional stability in varying humidity, low-friction sliding components.

Watch Out For: Limited impact resistance, formaldehyde degradation if overheated, poor adhesion.

Polycarbonate: The Impact Champion

Polycarbonate applications
Polycarbonate is unmatched for impact resistance and optical clarity

Best For: Optical clarity applications, exceptional impact resistance, electrical enclosures, safety equipment.

Watch Out For: Very poor chemical resistance, environmental stress cracking, UV degradation without stabilizers.

PEEK: The High-Performance Specialist

Best For: Extreme temperatures (up to 250°C), aggressive chemical environments, aerospace and medical implants.

Watch Out For: Extremely high cost (10-20x nylon), high processing temperatures (350-400°C), requires specialized equipment.

Decision Matrix

If Your Priority Is… Best Choice Second Choice
Lowest Cost Nylon PC
Highest Strength PEEK Nylon GF30
Chemische Beständigkeit PEEK POM
Wear Resistance POM Nylon
Schlagzähigkeit PC Nylon
Dimensionsstabilität POM PEEK
Material selection flowchart
Use this decision framework to narrow down your material choices

Our Capabilities

With over 300 CNC machines, we produce more than 10,000 pieces daily with tolerances as tight as ±0.005mm. We accept MOQ from 1 piece, with delivery times ranging from 24 hours to 15 days. We work with all four engineering plastics. Get a quote within 24 hours.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Can I use nylon instead of PEEK to save money?

In many cases, yes—if your application doesn’t require PEEK’s extreme temperature resistance or chemical inertness.

Why choose POM over nylon when nylon is stronger?

POM’s low moisture absorption, excellent dimensional stability, and low friction make it better when precision matters more than strength.

Is there a material combining PC’s clarity with nylon’s chemical resistance?

Transparent materials with good chemical resistance exist (polysulfone, PEI/Ultem) but are significantly more expensive than PC.

What’s the most common mistake in engineering plastic selection?

Selecting the cheapest material that meets static properties without considering the full service environment. Always test under realistic conditions.

Entwerfen wir Ihre individuelle Lösung

Dieses Feld ist erforderlich.
Dieses Feld ist erforderlich.
Dieses Feld ist erforderlich.
Dieses Feld ist erforderlich.

Einen Kommentar hinterlassen

Ihre E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Nach oben blättern